To the editor:
The recent PCC newsletter provides a detailed article on the proposed school bond issue and some of its history and implications. The picture is not pretty.
To muddy the …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
To the editor:
The recent PCC newsletter provides a detailed article on the proposed school bond issue and some of its history and implications. The picture is not pretty.
To muddy the waters even further, the article claims that the public would get a chance to ask questions about the proposed bond issue “before final details were set.” The article then goes on to say, “Cost and scope of the bond can and will be adjusted after the election.”
That is like closing the barn door after the horse got away.
The fact of the matter is that if we don’t approve the bond issue now, the work will still have to be done at a later date when more of “THE DONALD’S” inflation takes effect.
The PCC newsletter touches briefly on the police station overrun. There have been many more through the years.
Let’s hope we can get this one right. Portsmouth has a tough history on major capital work.
Philip Driscoll
Portsmouth