To the editor:

The Bristol Animal Shelter reflects the best of our community. Years ago, people worked tirelessly to raise funds to finance the shelter that you, the residents, voted overwhelmingly to build. The shelter is a beautiful facility that offers compassion and the promise of life to lost, abandoned and neglected animals. It is a place of joy for the many volunteers who are there daily, it is a place of hope that fosters the love between people and the animals they adopt. Bristol residents, you have every reason to be proud of the Bristol Shelter; it is a success story.

But now, something seems afoot by town officials. Why was the directive given to forbid transfer of animals from other towns when we have the space to care for more dogs and cats who will otherwise be euthanized? Why was the order given that certain animals must be evicted within thirty days, particularly, one sweet, happy cat that has lived at the shelter for 16 years? The directives by our elected officials are disturbing and heartbreaking. They make no sense.

Bristol citizens have an abiding respect for life — both human and animal — and we understand the importance of a well-run, no-kill animal shelter. Town leaders, I know that many of you are animal lovers, stand tall, please explain these troubling directives to us. What is your vision for the shelter? Show us that you care for the welfare of animals who cannot speak or vote for themselves. Let the Bristol Animal Shelter continue to be a loving refuge and a shining example of what Bristol is all about.

Cathy Cook Holmstrom
Bristol