Warren gets state OK to exceed property tax cap

Posted

Calling the town’s financial state an "emergency situation," the state auditor general on Wednesday approved the Town of Warren’s request to exceed the state’s maximum property tax levy by $685,694 this coming fiscal year. As it stands right now, the result will be a tax increase in the neighborhood of 7.6 percent, nearly double the 4 percent max allowed by state law.

Read what the state Auditor General has to say about Warren's tax cap emergency

Warren is the only town in the state to ask permission to exceed the tax cap this year. The overage was brought on by a sharp increase in school spending — approximately $1.5 million more than last year — which was due mostly to a rise in school enrollment in Warren and a corresponding increase in the town’s financial obligation to the Bristol Warren Regional School District.

The Warren Town Council offset much of that school increase by cutting many town services, terminating several part time employees and putting off capital spending and long-planned projects. In all, councilors cut about $1 million from the municipal budget to help bring the tax levy down, but still fell $685,694 short of their goal. Had auditor general Dennis E. Hoyle had not approved the overage request, the council would have had to cut more. Town council president Chris Stanley said the additional cuts would cost additional employees their jobs, as “there’s nowhere else to cut.”

Under the state’s approved levy, Warren’s tax rate this coming year will be $20.09, up from the current $18.67. That means that the owner of a $250,000 home will pay $5,022.50 in property taxes this coming year, up $355 from the current year. The budget must still be approved by voters at Financial Town Meeting in May.

Councilors said last week that the levy increase is not a solution, just a temporary answer in an ongoing problem. Without the tax base as a means to generate additional tax revenue,  and a minority position on the Joint Finance Committee, the Town of Warren will see similar financial emergencies every year, councilors say.

“We have to look at the numbers, we have to look at the future,” councilor Joseph DePasquale said at a sparsely attended public budget hearing last week. “It would not be prudent for us to not look down the road for an answer.”

Even though the state answered the levy question, town officials are still waiting for word on one other significant request: That the state’s education funding formula be applied differently in Bristol Warren. In a suit filed two weeks ago, town officials asked a Rhode Island Superior Court judge to determine whether the state’s funding formula has been applied properly for the past three years; councilors believe they have been paying too much as a result of an improperly applied formula.

The answer to that question will account for an approximate $2 million swing in the budget, either way.

Read more:

Warren's budget cuts: A closer look at the numbers

Councilors fear for town's long term fiscal health

 

Comments

7 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Honoré de Balzac

"Without the tax base as a means to generate additional tax revenue..."

I'm confused, Warren has loads of businesses downtown & on RT 136, restaurants along the river, high priced condos on RT 114, waterfront homes on Touisett. It seems to me that they do in fact have a tax base. Has anyone looked at Warren's property values versus those of Bristol's? If Warren is such a great place then they should have comparable property values to Bristol and Borrington.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | Report this
StillBroke

We do have a tax base. That statement confuses me too. Plus, the fact is, we already have pretty high taxes.

For example: I have a home that's just like this one http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/6-Belvedere-Dr-Bristol-RI-02809/65848516_zpid/. My "Zestimate" is $18K less and my appraised tax value is $56K less however my taxes are $1,000 higher and about to go up 7.6%.

As you can see, a comparable property (3br, 2,000 ft cape w/ 2 car garage sitting on a 10,000 s.f. lot ), has a market value of about 6% less in Warren but, my taxes are 25% more in Warren and heading higher very soon.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | Report this
Honoré de Balzac

Stillbroke - something seems wrong. Versus Bristol, Warren has a lower population but it also has a lower number of students attending the district. Bristol & Warren have comparable business footprints. If what you state is correct, and I have no reason to doubt you, the higher property taxes in Warren should be enough to cover the students costs plus the costs to run the smaller town.

Get the state auditors in now and let them look at the books. I don't think Mr. Stanley and crew know what the heck they're doing.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | Report this
StillBroke

And Barrington, the best school system in the state, spends at least 20% less per child.

http://www.eastbayri.com/news/barrington-high-school-ranked-best-in-state-among-top-500-in-us/

Saturday, April 26, 2014 | Report this
StillBroke

Wow! I just did the math. Barrington spends just about 72% as much as BWRS (17,202*.72=12,385) or looked at another way, BWRS spends about 38% more than Barrington (12379*1.38=17,083). They have a smaller tax base, spend less per pupil and are still getting great results. Something just doesn't add up to me.

Saturday, April 26, 2014 | Report this
Joel Hellmann

Stillbroke. You are very right. I am on the Barrington committee on Appropriations and last week this came up. We do have great schools but we cannot be 3rd from the Bottom in per pupil expence. The average public school teacher makes $67,000 per year. In Barrington the AVERAGE teacher make$ 86,000 Per year. And the teachers pay and related Benifits are 86% of the budget Which means our teacher comp is so much more than average that we could to possibly be 30 out of 33. The math doesn't work. I have my thoughts on how but the schools still insist the numbers are right

Sunday, April 27, 2014 | Report this
CaptainDave

I find it hilarious how they sold joining the schools as cost effective, yet 20 yrs later lol

Monday, April 28, 2014 | Report this

2016 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Prudence Island · Riverside · Rumford · Seekonk · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Jim McGaw

A lifelong Portsmouth resident, Jim graduated from Portsmouth High School in 1982 and earned a journalism degree from the University of Rhode Island in 1986. He's worked two different stints at East Bay Newspapers, for a total of 18 years with the company so far. When not running all over town bringing you the news from Portsmouth, Jim listens to lots and lots and lots of music, watches obscure silent films from the '20s and usually has three books going at once. He also loves to cook crazy New Orleans dishes for his wife of 25 years, Michelle, and their two sons, Jake and Max.