Are you listening, Bristol? Law is on Warren’s side


To the editor:

The Town of Warren maintains that pursuant to Article VII of the Enabling Legislation, the treasurer of the Bristol Warren Regional School District is responsible for apportioning the proportionate share of costs between Bristol and Warren on a per pupil basis. Additionally, The Town of Warren asserts that the new state wide funding formula determines the amount of state aid each town receives on per pupil based on the number of students who receive free or reduced price lunch and our capacity to pay. For the fiscal year 2014, approximately 46 percent of Warren students receive free or reduced lunch while only 32 percent of the Bristol students receive a free or reduced priced lunch.

Our position is clear and firmly rooted in the legislature’s intent to equalize the burden that is placed as the result of increasing poverty and our inability to fairly generate revenue. At the last JFC meeting Warren cited the legislation, RIDE documents and several other publications that support our claim. For example, Leslie A. Maxwell, a contributor to Education Week, asserts in her article entitled “School Funding Formula Aims at Equity” that “the new formula is linked to student enrollment and accounts for a community’s ability to pay local school costs. Districts with increased student enrollments or that serve large numbers of poor students will see their state share of aid rise, while those with falling enrollment or fewer poor students will see their funding decrease.” Bristol’s only offered an empty response void of any evidence to refute our claim.

Sadly, the Bristol members of the JFC instead voted to allow the district to take the state aid allocated to the Town of Warren and gave it to themselves. Clearly, this violates the legislative intent of the funding formula which is outlined on RIDE’s web site. In fact, RIDE provides an extraordinarily salient list of legislation summary points. RIDE argues that the new formula “uses a unique state/local share ratio that considers a district’s ability to pay through adjusted assessed property values and the poverty concentration of the district. This calculation is effective at equalizing the local burden of areas with concentrated poverty and puts emphasis on the area of greater need, whether it is municipal capacity to pay or student need” (RIGL16-7.2-4).

Furthermore, members of the League of Women Votes of Rhode Island, Barbara Feldman and Joanne DeVoe stress in an article entitled, “The Education Adequacy Act: a Formula for the Distribution of State Aid to Schools,” that “when the Rhode Island General Assembly passed the Education Adequacy Act in June of 2010, it was a bold new public education funding equalization program that had been designed by Brown University experts and featured a formula that included a quadratic mean. No other state has utilized this quadratic mean formula. The new state aid formula is planned to cost the state the same amount as the current system but redistributes those funds according to the latest data on student enrollment, student needs, and local ability to pay.”

It is in this way that a local community, burdened with a concentration of poverty, is provided a boost in state aid. Clearly, this highlights the legislative intent of the new funding formula and the most recent documents provided by RIDE breakout the state aid  by  carefully considering a municipality’s  capacity to pay  and their individual community’s student need. The breakdown of the revenue by the Department of Education is a transparent way to account for additional local burden that exists because of a high concentration of poverty. The purpose of submitting the dollars in this way is self-evident. The calculation equalizes the local burden of towns such as Warren that experience high concentrations of poverty when compared to those with fewer financial burdens. Nevertheless, while the evidence to support our argument continues to compound the Town of Bristol’s only response in no one they talk to agrees with our conclusions. Perhaps Bristol’s members of the JFC should carefully examine the legislation and read the supporting documents instead of simply speaking to each other.

Chris Stanley

402 Market St., Warren

Mr. Stanley is the president of the Warren Town Council.


5 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

Here is what I see when looking at the RIDE site.

Chariho has it's own $ amount, as do the individual towns that make it up.

Bristol-Warren and Exeter-West Grenwich do not.

You mention as supporting documentation "intent" and other articles. But, I don't see anywhere you have posted language from the law (sorry if I'm missing it). Anyone can write their opinion on it, but that doesn't make it correct.

Can you point directly to the law where it says Bristol gets X, Warren gets Y? It sounds from what you post, it is up to the treasurer. So, you're saying the treasurer should do it differently because you want it to be done differently because it benefits warren (and I understand, that's your job).

Friday, March 28, 2014 | Report this

You're right about the spending bonanza.

This school district is so financially irresponsible. Where and how is this $16 million in RIDE money benefiting the underprivileged students in both towns? I don't see it. Hugh Cole School in Warren has most of these students and I don't see any evidence of tools (eg. Smart boards) or resources (eg. Part time reading tutors).

They just use this $ to bloat the administration. 20 years ago, schools had a principal and vice principal. Now, we are paying for an additional asst. principal and dean of students? How does this help the underprivileged?

The school district should be able to operate without the RIDE money. The RIDE money should be for extra programs, but where are the extra programs? We need transparency from this district.

Saturday, March 29, 2014 | Report this

Hey tats, run for office...I have been reading your posts for quite sometime. Put your mon ey where your mouth is...maybe you will be the TAT who actually gets something done. One more thing,,, lets end the regionalization, I like many Bristol residents are tired of carring your town.

Friday, April 4, 2014 | Report this

Hey tats, run for office...I have been reading your posts for quite sometime. Put your mon ey where your mouth is...maybe you will be the TAT who actually gets something done. One more thing,,, lets end the regionalization, I like many Bristol residents are tired of carring your town.

Friday, April 4, 2014 | Report this

Seems to me that the logical solution is for each town, Bristol and Warren, to revert to their former separate school districts. Then, there can be no bickering nor accusing nor finger pointing as to whom is carrying whom and whom has the greater or lesser financial responsibility. That's my two cents...

Saturday, April 26, 2014 | Report this

2016 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Prudence Island · Riverside · Rumford · Seekonk · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Jim McGaw

A lifelong Portsmouth resident, Jim graduated from Portsmouth High School in 1982 and earned a journalism degree from the University of Rhode Island in 1986. He's worked two different stints at East Bay Newspapers, for a total of 18 years with the company so far. When not running all over town bringing you the news from Portsmouth, Jim listens to lots and lots and lots of music, watches obscure silent films from the '20s and usually has three books going at once. He also loves to cook crazy New Orleans dishes for his wife of 25 years, Michelle, and their two sons, Jake and Max.