Ted:
Thanks for clarifying. I scanned too quickly from the top of the paragraph and didn't include the correct name with the judgement amount.
However, your follow-up comment is interesting. Are you saying that Mr. Sigourney also has a won a judgment against Ms. Goldberg? The article only says that "he lost some $53,000" to Ms. Goldberg, not that he has a binding court judgment. I left it alone because someone saying he is owed money could be a classic he said/she said. If a court hearing resulted in a judgment against Ms. Goldberg, that's a different kettle of fish.
The town had no right to have a closed door meeting. Ms. Goldberg has no right to defy 1 and possibly 2 court judgments. The final sentence in my original post stands.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
