What do Little Compton Republican candidates mean by “back to basics" in education, which was repeated multiple times during the recent public forum?
As the political landscape heats …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
What do Little Compton Republican candidates mean by “back to basics" in education, which was repeated multiple times during the recent public forum?
As the political landscape heats up and candidates vie for our attention, one phrase has emerged as a buzzword in discussions about education: “back to the basics.” But what exactly do Republicans mean when they advocate for this return? And, more importantly, what does it imply for the future of our students, who are anything but basic?
Our school is achieving remarkable success, boasting the highest test scores in the state. This achievement reflects not just an adherence to traditional "core" subjects like reading, math, and science, but also a commitment to fostering critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence.
So, why is there a call to revert to a seemingly outdated notion of education? Are we really suggesting that our students, who are thriving in an increasingly complex world, should settle for a stripped-down version of their educational experience? The term “basics” often conjures images of rote memorization and rigid curricula, but if our students are already excelling in these areas, then what more is there to gain by going “back” anywhere? Instead of looking backward, shouldn’t we be focusing on what propels our students forward? The realities of today’s world require more than basic skills; they demand adaptability, innovation, and collaboration. Our education system must reflect this dynamic landscape, preparing students not for yesterday's challenges, but for tomorrow's opportunities.
Additionally, the idea of common sense in education raises further questions. What does it mean to apply common sense in an environment that is constantly evolving? Is it common sense to ignore the advancements in educational pedagogy and technology that have proven effective? Is it common sense to disregard the diverse needs of our students, who come from various backgrounds and possess a range of talents and interests? To suggest that we should prioritize a return to the basics may inadvertently signal a desire to limit our students’ potential. We should be nurturing the whole student, recognizing that education is not simply about test scores, but about developing well-rounded individuals who can think critically and engage thoughtfully with the world around them. We agree wholeheartedly that supporting the whole student is at the center of our responsibility. This means going beyond the basics and considering the social, emotional, and psychological needs of our students. It means embracing a holistic approach to education that prepares them not only academically but also as compassionate and responsible citizens.
Let us focus on enhancing what is working while also innovating for the future. Our students deserve more than basic—they deserve an education that inspires, challenges, and prepares them to thrive in a complex, interconnected world.
I ask our Little Compton voters to reflect on this phrase “back to the basics” and make the choice to advance the educational opportunities for our children, not take them away.
Megan Gonzalez
Gonzalez is vice chair of the Little Compton Democratic Town Committee.