Letter: Ratepayers shouldn’t subsidize proposed biomass plant

Posted 6/4/18

To the editor:

Why should Rhode Island electric ratepayers subsidize an incinerator? If Rhode Island legislators expand the definition of net-metering resources to include “biomass” …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Not a subscriber?


Start a Subscription

Sign up to start a subscription today! Click here to see your options.

Purchase a day pass

Purchase 24 hours of website access for $2. Click here to continue

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Letter: Ratepayers shouldn’t subsidize proposed biomass plant

Posted

To the editor:

Why should Rhode Island electric ratepayers subsidize an incinerator? If Rhode Island legislators expand the definition of net-metering resources to include “biomass” fuels, this will be the result.

When you hear “renewable energy” you think of something green, clean, and good for our environment like solar or wind energy, but this proposal is different. This bill would change the definition of renewable energy to include the burning of wood — and construction debris in particular — which is known to release high levels of particulate matter and carbon dioxide. This would negatively affect our state’s ability to meet our Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative commitments and Resilient Rhode Island Act targets.

Biomass incineration releases soot and other air pollutants which is known to have a negative effect on air quality and on Rhode Islander’s health. According to Kids Count, Rhode Island already has the seventh highest self-reported child asthma prevalence among ranked states.

Biomass incineration is not a low-carbon power source. Just like fossil fuels, when wood burns, it releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Burning wood releases all of its stored carbon dioxide instantly, up to four times more carbon than coal for the same energy produced. Importantly, the carbon dioxide spike released worldwide from biomass burning will take several decades to neutralize through the replanting of trees, time we don't have before we may cross dangerous and irrevocable climate tipping points. It was for these reasons that biomass was specifically excluded from the 2011 net metering bill.

Supporters say that this change will bring the law into compliance with the Renewable Energy Standard was set in 2004, but this standard sorely needs to be updated in view of current science. I would argue that the Resilient Rhode Island Act of 2014 supersedes the standard and directs all state agencies to take climate change into consideration. 

So let’s connect the dots: Climate change is causing sea level rise. Rhode Island has 400 miles of coastline and is very vulnerable to sea level rise. Science tells us that sea level rise is occurring due to increased human-produced greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. Let’s not exacerbate the problem by bringing on another CO2-producing power plant in Rhode Island.

Terri Cortvriend

46 Mary Lane

Portsmouth

Ms. Cortvriend is a candidate for state representative, District 72.

2020 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Jim McGaw

A lifelong Portsmouth resident, Jim graduated from Portsmouth High School in 1982 and earned a journalism degree from the University of Rhode Island in 1986. He's worked two different stints at East Bay Newspapers, for a total of 18 years with the company so far. When not running all over town bringing you the news from Portsmouth, Jim listens to lots and lots and lots of music, watches obscure silent films from the '20s and usually has three books going at once. He also loves to cook crazy New Orleans dishes for his wife of 25 years, Michelle, and their two sons, Jake and Max.