Letter: Monastery proposals are all about profit

Posted 3/22/23

To the editor:

I’m writing to thank you for bringing attention to the Monastery plans and upcoming public meetings. I also want to sound loud alarm bells for Barrington residents. Although …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Register to post events


If you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here.

Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content.

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Letter: Monastery proposals are all about profit

Posted

To the editor:

I’m writing to thank you for bringing attention to the Monastery plans and upcoming public meetings. I also want to sound loud alarm bells for Barrington residents. Although this is impacting my neighborhood today, other neighborhoods could be next.

The current proposals being railroaded through do not remotely resemble ANY of the initial designs or proposals put to Barrington residents during the Ad Hoc Committee process. The plans are not remotely aligned in any way to the spirit of the original motion to purchase the property which promised to put control in the hands of the Barrington community. The plans they will ask us to approve are designed by consultants to provide profits to developers and upend the fabric of our neighborhood, period.

The design proposals include a Frankenstein plan for 53 units on 4.8 acres (Land Use 2)!! That is way out of proportion to the surrounding area and the Memorandum supporting these plans clearly shows that the literal bottom line is profit, supported by density greater than other Barrington neighborhoods and greater than anything the residents were shown previously.  

Why did we spend so much money on consultants that are looking for the best deal for developers? Why didn’t the consultants explore ways to achieve our original mission of low-density senior housing? Why didn’t they research ways to find funding with land grants, working with Barrington Land Conservation, and private/public partnerships. They didn’t even look.

Throughout the Ad Hoc Committee process Barrington residents provided a clear and consistent message that the town should maintain the building, maintain low-density, and leave ample green space for everyone’s use. It was a shock that the Ad Hoc committee was terminated; it felt abrupt, premature, and a way to prevent further input from residents in the direction of the plan proposals. Additionally, we have seen that speaking at public meetings (when we are allowed to) isn’t the same thing as representation and participation.

The upcoming public meetings on March 28 and April 26 are opportunities for Barrington residents to voice their concerns with this dense development and stop this consultant-driven process. There is a better plan for this unique property.

Sincerely,

Paige Barbour

Barrington

2024 by East Bay Media Group

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Jim McGaw

A lifelong Portsmouth resident, Jim graduated from Portsmouth High School in 1982 and earned a journalism degree from the University of Rhode Island in 1986. He's worked two different stints at East Bay Newspapers, for a total of 18 years with the company so far. When not running all over town bringing you the news from Portsmouth, Jim listens to lots and lots and lots of music, watches obscure silent films from the '20s and usually has three books going at once. He also loves to cook crazy New Orleans dishes for his wife of 25 years, Michelle, and their two sons, Jake and Max.