Letter: Is Tiverton landfill public hearing a ploy for political cover?

Posted 11/20/19

To the editor:

At the July 29, 2019, town \council workshop, Pare Engineering discussed three post-landfill closure options: a transfer station, a recycling center, and continuing curbside pickup …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Not a subscriber?


Start a Subscription

Sign up to start a subscription today! Click here to see your options.

Purchase a day pass

Purchase 24 hours of website access for $2. Click here to continue

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Letter: Is Tiverton landfill public hearing a ploy for political cover?

Posted

To the editor:

At the July 29, 2019, town \council workshop, Pare Engineering discussed three post-landfill closure options: a transfer station, a recycling center, and continuing curbside pickup finding ways to deal with certain recyclables.

At the August 13, 2019, town council meeting, the town council voted unanimously for the option to continue curbside pickup; the clear guidance the town administrator requested happened at that meeting so he could commence exploring options of dealing with certain recyclables.    

Yet, at the October 28, 2019, town council meeting, replacement town council president Patricia Hilton scheduled a public hearing on the post landfill-closing options.  When questioned by me as to why this was necessary given that the town council had already voted on an option, Hilton claimed the town council “had not voted to pick one thing in particular” but had gone forward with the idea of a recycling center, and that it was clearly said at the August 13 meeting that “we wanted public input,” that the public should be made aware of and have a voice in the decision.

At the November 8, 2019, meeting, while discussing my motion to change a “public” hearing to an “informational” hearing, I said a vote had already been taken, and no one had indicated a public hearing needed to be held prior to voting.  Replacement president Hilton now claimed she had made it clear at the August 13, 2019, town council meeting she wanted public input.

Both of Hilton’s claims are false.  

On August 13, a unanimous vote was taken to continue the curbside pickup.  And, no one raised the need for a public hearing before the town council voted.  Hilton spoke three times during that meeting.  At time 1:29:24 about seeing costs for both recycling possibilities and scheduling frequency of curbside pickups since abandoned furniture sits on the sidewalk for weeks in rental properties in N. Tiverton.  At time1:35:48 commenting on Councilman Katz’ proposed amendment to the motion.  And at time 1:51:00 questioning whether access to a recycling site could be had from Industrial Way, and that site next to the DPW would be perfect, but it is too wet.

The state-wide mailings sent to Tiverton voters before the recall election on October 10 lied that the town council had not dealt with the imminent landfill closure. Hilton, who signed the recall petition, knew then that was not true.  So, why is she now claiming no vote was taken, and that she had always stated a need for a public hearing before such a vote (which, by the way, was unanimous) when she hadn’t?  Sounds like political cover to me.

Nancy Driggs

Member, Tiverton Town Council

  

2020 by East Bay Newspapers

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
Jim McGaw

A lifelong Portsmouth resident, Jim graduated from Portsmouth High School in 1982 and earned a journalism degree from the University of Rhode Island in 1986. He's worked two different stints at East Bay Newspapers, for a total of 18 years with the company so far. When not running all over town bringing you the news from Portsmouth, Jim listens to lots and lots and lots of music, watches obscure silent films from the '20s and usually has three books going at once. He also loves to cook crazy New Orleans dishes for his wife of 25 years, Michelle, and their two sons, Jake and Max.