So it's OK to reward 99% of the workforce that is in the union with a 2% raise, but leave non-union management in the dust? Why? They work just as hard, have a higher level of responsibility, and went backward on their pay in the last few years. It's a cheap political trick, preying on City administration only, but keeping quiet about the School administration pay. Not so coincidently, this local publication is just as quiet about the School budget details. Why? Maybe because it would make for more fair coverage and less low-brow controversy...
Please explain the inappropriate content below.