Portsmouth delays vote on resolution opposing Mayflower cable

Will take up matter again at next meeting

By Jim McGaw
Posted 8/23/22

PORTSMOUTH — A resolution to oppose the installation of the Mayflower Wind transmission cable in the Sakonnet River was on Monday’s agenda for a vote by the Town Council, but no action …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Register to post events


If you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here.

Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content.

Day pass subscribers

Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.


Portsmouth delays vote on resolution opposing Mayflower cable

Will take up matter again at next meeting

Posted

PORTSMOUTH — A resolution to oppose the installation of the Mayflower Wind transmission cable in the Sakonnet River was on Monday’s agenda for a vote by the Town Council, but no action was taken.

Instead, the council voted unanimously to table the matter until its next meeting on the suggestion of Keith Hamilton, who had placed the resolution on the agenda.

IN OTHER COUNCIL NEWS: Portsmouth ends fiscal year with large budget surplus

The town’s attorneys, Hamilton said, need to “massage this” further before it comes before the council for a vote.

The current language of the resolution states that while Portsmouth “has been a leader in the renewable energy production as the first municipal wind turbine in Rhode Island,” there are still too many concerns regarding the Mayflower project for the town to support the plan.

The resolution also contended that the cable route could disrupt two other existing supply lines to Aquidneck Island.

“The current design of the Mayflower submarine cable has not had a full environmental study completed to assess the impact of the cable on marine life, fishing industry and the environment in our protect wetlands,” the resolution stated. “Aquidneck Island has only one natural gas pipeline feeding the island that crosses the intended path of the Mayflower cable and the Island’s back-up water supply also crosses the path of the proposed cable.”

At the Aug. 9 council meeting, Hamilton expressed concerns over the cable route’s potential impact on the gas and water pipelines located in the Sakonnet River. He pointed to the natural gas outage several years ago which led National Grid to install a controversial backup facility in a residential area on Old Mill Lane.

The resolution concluded by stating the council request the denial of the “Mayflower application until such time that full environmental study of the entire cable length can be conducted and a secondary natural gas pipeline can be installed on the Northern end of Aquidneck Island to safely protect the supply onto the island.”  

Also on Monday night, the council voted unanimously during an executive session before the public portion of the meeting to retain legal and consulting services associated with the Mayflower project proceedings before the EFSB.

RELATED NEWS: Attorney for town tells state board that Mayflower should explore alternate routes

2024 by East Bay Media Group

Barrington · Bristol · East Providence · Little Compton · Portsmouth · Tiverton · Warren · Westport
Meet our staff
MIKE REGO

Mike Rego has worked at East Bay Newspapers since 2001, helping the company launch The Westport Shorelines. He soon after became a Sports Editor, spending the next 10-plus years in that role before taking over as editor of The East Providence Post in February of 2012. To contact Mike about The Post or to submit information, suggest story ideas or photo opportunities, etc. in East Providence, email mrego@eastbaymediagroup.com.