To the editor:
Once again, the Portsmouth Town Council has stonewalled residents who are trying to protect their town from the worst aspects of commercial solar development.
At their …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Not a subscriber?Start a SubscriptionSign up to start a subscription today! Click here to see your options. Purchase a day passPurchase 24 hours of website access for $2. Click here to continue |
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
To the editor:
Once again, the Portsmouth Town Council has stonewalled residents who are trying to protect their town from the worst aspects of commercial solar development.
At their most recent meeting, the council refused to comment on an agenda item for a proposed moratorium on solar farms and would not even consider voting on it. On the advice of the town solicitor, they allowed residents to advocate for the moratorium but would not give attendees the courtesy of any discourse.
Many of the people in attendance had already lost in their bid to stop an 18-acre parcel in their neighborhood from being deforested to put in a major solar array, so it wasn’t self-interest that was their motivation to promote another moratorium. Rather, it was protection of their neighbors’ interests and the town’s character through providing time to consider further improvements to the ordinance.
By thumbing its collective nose at town residents, the Town Council has written yet another sorry chapter in the town’s murky commercial solar ordinance history. We were invited to submit amendments to the ordinance, but why bother when the council will likely summarily dismiss them without providing any feedback on why they don’t like them?
I don’t know what the town solicitor’s goal was in preventing two-way discussion, but if it was to sow distrust and disbelief in the council, it certainly succeeded.
David Howard
36 Marial Rose Drive
Portsmouth