Letter: Legislators, opponents wrong in labor contract legislation issue
To the editor:
This is soooo much drivel! Both the Federal Labor Relations Authority and the National Labor Relations Board honor the labor law and regulation of "Status Quo Ante". Which means …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
Register to post eventsIf you'd like to post an event to our calendar, you can create a free account by clicking here. Note that free accounts do not have access to our subscriber-only content. |
Day pass subscribers
Are you a day pass subscriber who needs to log in? Click here to continue.
Letter: Legislators, opponents wrong in labor contract legislation issue
To the editor:
This is soooo much drivel! Both the Federal Labor Relations Authority and the National Labor Relations Board honor the labor law and regulation of "Status Quo Ante". Which means that even an expired contract between identical parties is the starting point of any new negotiations.
The only time things go backwards is if you are dealing with a new union or the organization has had a total reorganization.
Please don't delude yourselves that letting a contract die gets you back to "no contract status". The law and legislation was totally unnecessary and redundant. The ignorance in this state is becoming unbearable!
Mimi Karlsson
Hope Valley
Little Compton
The writer is retired president of NAGE/SEIU local R1-240 for 28 years at EPA-Atlantic Ecology Div- Narragansett.
